
Chimborazo: One of the expedition destinations
Emerging from my zombie state I find that not only have I managed to keep all the plants alive, pay my bills, stay on top of readings, and participate in the planning of an expedition, but that I also now have a new member in my household.
I am also half way through the Career Skills Portfolio which is a required part of the Graduate School programme for PhD students.
How is that going? You ask. Well, I will admit that at times my participation may have been a little cynical (but as it is online, nobody was there to be stung by my attitude, or get burned by the acid dripping from my one raised eyebrow). Confronted with the information that the ‘Skills Audit’ is being replaced by the ’Researcher Development Framework’,
I felt a short burst of sadness and nostalgia, mixed with just a pinch of frustration at the knowledge that all the work that had been put into filling out the reams of evidence demonstrating the skills that various government bodies feel we should be able to demonstrate at this point in our careers is now obsolete. So much for convincing my fellow PhD students last year that it could be a useful tool if used correctly, and that we should take the time to fill it in properly. If I don’t take the time to export the audit files into one of my own, it will be lost in this new step in the march of progress. But what is this new opportunity? (note the positive twist). Well, let us take a look:
The Researcher Development Statement divides required skills and attributes of a productive researcher into four main domains (and comes with several nifty diagrammes):
Domain A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities – The knowledge, intellectual abilities and techniques to do research.
Domain B: Personal effectiveness – The personal qualities and approach to be an effective researcher.
Domain C: Research governance and organisation – The knowledge of the standards, requirements and professionalism to do research.
Domain D: Engagement, influence and impact – The knowledge and skills to work with others and ensure the wider impact of research (Vitae).
But that is not all. Not only do my preferred personal qualities (PPQ? Can we start using this in conversation please) come with a colour scheme, but each domain has three sub-domains, accompanied by descriptors covering different aspects of being a researcher.
The full Researcher Development Framework adds phases for each of the descriptors that will allow researchers to plan their personal development in selected areas.
(Note the phases do not correspond to different categories of the research career as it is recognised that people can progress with very different strengths*).
In case anyone is getting worried about their future at this point, Vitae provide a Personal Planning tool for use with the RDF and a screen-cast to help researchers to begin with the tool. Am I the only person asking “what is a screen-cast?” at this point?
The question is now obviously: How was this designed? Who designed it? How will it affect my (UK University attending PhD student) life? Do I have to fill out more forms asking the same things as the Skills Audit but using a different format, incompatible operating system and wording each question slightly differently so as to make all previous answers useless?
“The Researcher Development Framework was based on research work that surveyed the views of successful researchers (definition please) of all disciplines and types of institutions (hmmm), based around the question “what makes a good researcher?” (ie: describe yourself please).
A phenomenographic approach was used in the analysis to help establish a range of key characteristics. The results were then clustered into common groups and the work was enhanced from the literature, consultancy with specialist groups (including employers) and sector feedback”.
Ok.
“The PDR Skills Audit was based on the Joint Skills Statement and is now optional. The PDR is being revised (with an expected completion date of Autumn 2012), and the new version will explicitly reference the Research Development Statement/Framework.
We have provided an online introduction to the Researcher Development Statement for new students, which will be used in the First year workshops and the Online Skills Course.
The resources in the Vital module for Postgraduate Research Students are aligned with the sub-domains of the Researcher Development Statement”.
Hmmm. Well, ok. I suppose that I can do this. But will we have to make a giant colour coded interactive poster demonstrating competence and understanding of all the different aspects of the domains and phases?
BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEPPPPPPPPPPP
Well. I am still awaiting a response to those last questions, so in the meantime I have continued working on the skills portfolio. In Self-Awareness week (take these online tests if you would like to recreate the experience: Careers Report; Know your personality; What motivates you – I actually quite liked the whole feel of this one, but unfortunately did it after a lot of others so have made a note to go back to it), I discovered that I don’t really fit. Not one to give up entirely, I relied on guided (or planned) serendipity and listened to the world, to my concerns, and to the creative side of my brain and was rewarded with a stream of fortunate events. One of these was the introduction to coworking, and therefore the realisation that there are many other
people out there who also don’t fit, and that the answer is to make square holes, not to sand down your edges. Others more specifically to do with my fieldwork will appear in the next post but I will leave you with a post by Alex Golub on Savage Minds. This is about a site called Wunderkit that is all about getting what you need to get done, done. It is about working in teams or by yourself, you can create sections for different projects, or just for your daily life. You get the satisfaction of ticking things off the list, it tells you what you have to get done, and you can share all the work you are doing with those on your team (for each project). I have been using it for a day now, and think that they may be on to a winner!
So there you have it. Back in the room!
*whew! I was beginning to get worried that we all have to fit into a tiny schematic that effectively plans our entire career using a colour by numbers approach.















